Over Target, The New York Times Rails Against Free Speech Warriors

Sunday’s New York Times carried a gargantuan rug chewing fit titled: “How Trump’s Allies are Winning the War Over Disinformation.” It weighs in at 4500 words. It claims, with the literary equivalent of great sobbing, that recent work by Elon Musk, Matt Taibbi, Michael Shellenberger, Mike Benz, the Attorney Generals of Missouri and Louisiana, Stephen Miller, and a cast of billionaire dollar donor deviants has placed a ton of sand in the gears of the U.S. censorship and propaganda Leviathan. The dynamic hologram currently playing at the White House, Joe Biden, is counting on this machinery to rig the 2024 presidential election, like it did in 2020.

In my younger years, as an associate of Lyndon LaRouche, I experienced just such over the top exercises from the venerable Grey Lady. The Times shares the role of telling the American population what to think, as determined by our defense intelligence community, a/k/a the Deep State, a/k/a The Blob, with the Washington Post. Each time, we were exposing major control points in their social engineering apparat. In 1973/74, for example, the New York Times was part of a COINTELPRO operation against us, which featured an FBI stoked assassination plot against LaRouche utilizing the Communist Party U.S.A., drugging by the British intelligence services, and other psychological warfare games. When the operation, later documented in FOIA documents, failed, threatening exposure of its component parts, The Times ran a defamation portraying us as crazed savages.    

The attempt here is to discredit and target the First Amendment warriors lest they destroy and disable this Leviathan before November’s elections. Today, Monday, March 18^th, Missouri v. Murthy (formerly Missouri v. Biden), will be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court. Litigated by the Attorney Generals of Missouri and Louisiana, the case resulted in a preliminary injunction by the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals against collaboration by the government with social media companies in censoring free speech. Biden’s Justice Department wants that injunction vacated ahead of the 2024 election. That lawsuit proved that federal officials targeted conservative speech about the origin of COVID-19, the efficacy of masks and vaccines, the security of voting by mail, the integrity of the 2020 presidential elections, and much more. It successfully censored it through threats and demands on Silicon Valley.

The Twitter files, enabled by Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter, and featuring exposes by Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger, exposed additional elements of the Censorship Industrial Complex. They explosively detailed the lawyer designed and laundered censorship operation surrounding Hunter Biden’s laptop ahead of the 2020 election and many other such schemes targeting Trump and the MAGA movement. In brief, the government through the CIA, the FBI, Homeland Security, the CDC, and Surgeon General laundered their censorship demands through well-funded private groups who then doxed Silicon Valley to censor protected speech. This included the censoring of the Hunter Biden laptop story ahead of the 2020 election.

Mike Benz comes under major defamatory assault by Times’ stenographers. He has broadened the investigation of the censorship and propaganda Leviathan to expose its Pentagon, NATO, and British components. He says that it is a military operation which has turned the psychological warfare apparatus underpinning foreign Anglo/American regime change operations against the citizens of the United States. Benz notes that since the latest iteration of this cognitive warfare operation began with Russiagate against Donald Trump, internet censorship has evolved into a “booming, lucrative, professional, 200,000 strong, $13 billion growth industry.”

Despite opposition from Donald Trump’s White House, CISA, housed in the Department of Homeland Security, designated itself as responsible for “the cognitive infrastructure” of the nation, to wit, how citizens acquire knowledge. It was deeply involved in censorship operations rigging the 2020 election. The “whole of government approach” to prevent foreign interference in the 2020 election at CISA initially focused on debunking the anticipated alarm which would arise when Donald Trump’s election night victory was transformed through mail in ballot fraud and other chicanery to a huge Biden win. It would seem they knew the result beforehand.

Benz’s research otherwise advances that of this author. We have been documenting full spectrum information warfare operations against Americans rooted in Ukraine’s 2014 color revolution coup and NATO’s active cognitive warfare regime since late 2016. Nina Jankowitz, praised gushingly by The Times, was to be the head of Biden’s Disinformation Governance Board before public outrage killed that proposal. Jankowitz formerly worked in Ukraine’s “Information Ministry,” for the National Endowment for Democracy’s National Democratic Institute, (the NED is widely acknowledged to be a CIA and Pentagon quango) and is currently registered as a foreign agent for the British government’s Center for Information Resilience.

According to the New York Times' exposes of the censorship and propaganda Leviathan, the lawsuits brought by Stephen Miller and the Attorney Generals, and widespread public dissemination of these exposes by Tucker Carlson and others have resulted in recruitment difficulties for the apparatus and a dangerous freezing of its operations ahead of the 2024 elections, a situation which must now be immediately cured.