Anticipation of America's "Golden Age" Turns into Action
The second Trump Presidency is less than 30 days away, but the physical economy is already being reorganized to rise up to the demands that the new Trump Presidency will place upon it.
What Americans are beginning to figure out, is that the multi-billion-dollar wind- and solar-power program to which Tim Walz has committed Minnesota (and Kamala Harris committed the US), is just the same sort of fiasco as Future Combat Systems and Boeing’s Starliner.
In this new century, what was once relatively rare in America has become commonplace: multibillion-dollar projects using what should be the best science and engineering talent—fail right out of the starting gate. But they don’t just end there. They limp on for years, soaking up more billions. Eventually, what was launched with fanfare, is quietly buried at night. This was the story of the US Army (and Boeing’s) Future Combat Systems program to replace the Bradley fighting vehicle and Abrams tank, and of FCS’s successor, the equally failed Ground Combat Vehicle. This was the story of the US Navy’s “littoral combat ship” and Zumwalt-Class Destroyer.
Now, two American astronauts have been stranded on the International Space Station since early June, because Boeing’s failed Starliner, which took them there, is so far unable to bring them back. NASA just announced that the astronauts may be stranded in orbit until next February, when they can be rescued by Boeing’s competitor, Elon Musk’s SpaceX, and its Crew Dragon.
Boeing’s Starliner and Musk’s Crew Dragon were launched simultaneously in 2010; Boeing’s contract was for $4.3 billion, and SpaceX’s for $2.5 billion. Since then, Boeing has never succeeded in delivering a crew until it brought this one up in June; SpaceX has made 15 successful (and no unsuccessful) trips.
Musk’s engineering worked; Boeing’s failed. So-called leaders went along with fashionable group-think, without ever checking the facts for themselves—all the way to disaster.
Now what Americans are beginning to figure out, is that the multi-billion-dollar wind- and solar-power program to which Tim Walz has committed Minnesota (and Kamala Harris committed the US), is just the same sort of fiasco as Future Combat Systems and Boeing’s Starliner.
Governor Walz put through a bill last year that mandates that by 2040, no electricity will be produced any longer from fossil fuels in Minnesota. Coal and gas-fired generators will be shut down. But he never spoke about any of the costs—not to the budget, but the state’s economy. Studies have shown that the bill will cause devastating blackouts—as in California and Texas, also heavily dependent on “renewables.” Electric bills will increase almost $4,000 every year for ten years. Minnesota will lose 79,000 jobs, especially in manufacturing, mining and agriculture.
Renewables proponents present a very one-sided picture. They claim these energy sources are cheaper than hydrocarbons and nuclear, but forget that they provide power only when the wind is blowing hard and the sun shining brightly. There are massive costs to provide power at other times, and to integrate intermittent renewables into the grid. When these costs are taken into account, wind and solar are not cheaper than hydrocarbons and nuclear, but 10-20 times more expensive.
And a grid which is high in intermittent energy sources like wind and solar can become highly unstable during high demand—hence the blackouts.
Climate extremism was part of a package Tim Walz signed onto when he left Congress to run for Governor in 2018. He dropped many of the views he once shared with the rural Minnesotans he had represented for five Congressional terms. In exchange, he bought into policies popular among foundations, NGOs, and progressive Democrats in the state’s major population centers. Especially so after Democrats took control of the legislature in 2022.
Which is the real Tim Walz? The gun-rights Congressman who won an “A” rating from the National Rifle Association, or the gun-control Governor who got an “F?” The Congressman whom rural Minnesotans re-elected five times, or the Governor they rejected for re-election in 2022, when he won the race thanks only to the big cities.
Which is the real Tim Walz? You decide.
What is the underlying character of this chameleon of a man? Walz has repeatedly described himself as a combat veteran, but he is not. Members of his National Guard battalion, where he was senior Non-Commissioned Officer, say that he retired suddenly after 24 years in the Guard, when he learned his unit would be sent to Iraq in 2005. They are outraged that he abandoned his men.
Leadership is courage; leadership is conviction. What sort of fiasco awaits a nation where Tim Walz has authority?
Get our free newsletter. Zero Spam.